Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory51.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170807
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-7900X-$950
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
87% 185 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 808
79% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,573
106% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$695
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 399
Reflection 461
Parallax 550
110% 470 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 536
Splatting 287
123% 361 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 115%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$430
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 836 808 776 712 479 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,630
Write 1,594
Mixed 727
SusWrite 799
265% 1,188 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 48.8
187% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 877
677% 925 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 213%
Great: 297%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$198
1TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 166 165 168 169 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 157
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 168
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
217% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 122%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$198
403GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 168 174 170 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 167
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 174
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
207% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 122%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 16GB-$18
1GB free, PID a205
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 42.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 19.8
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
6% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 14.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $2,284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback