Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory115.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-7940X-$1,349
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.5% Very good
1-Core 114
2-Core 246
84% 180 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 734
68% 554 Pts
64-Core 2,146
144% 2,146 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$650
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 475
Reflection 449
Parallax 557
125% 493 fps
MRender 403
Gravity 445
Splatting 252
128% 367 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 127%
Great: 132%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 1273 1221 1230 1112 1061 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,403
Write 2111
Mixed 1,563
SusWrite 1,229
409% 1,827 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 85.6
301% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 1,040
779% 1,042 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 311%
Great: 356%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$88
523GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 508 507 509 504 506 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
55GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 71 72 71 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 133
Write 130
Mixed 50
SusWrite 72.6
70% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 81%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$90
14GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 100 98 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 63.7
Write 60
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 99.3
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 110%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 212 219 213 219 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 204
Mixed 102
SusWrite 216
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.6
385% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C19 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 39.6
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 114%
Great: 153%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 1,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,522
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback