Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Common KVM processor 789 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 53 2-Core 105 45% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 192 27% 198 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 299 311 309 307 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 310 Write 315 Mixed 300 SusWrite 307 70% 308 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 6.3 21% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 161%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16