Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 142
59% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 434
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 53.9
36% 45.9 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 36.9
37% 46.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 406
Mixed 337
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 38
141% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 183
157% 231 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
753GB free
Firmware: CC3E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 80.9
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 72.5
70% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
760GB free
Firmware: AX1P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 98 101 103 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 99.2
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback