Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '19 at 13:55
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 113 2-Core 226 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 828 75% 628 Pts	64-Core 1,159 72% 1,159 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.4% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 108 Parallax 104 91% 108 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 95.6 Splatting 81.4 81% 102 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 146 130 134 204 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 286 Write 113 Mixed 172 SusWrite 166 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 22 90% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 39.9 DQ Write 42.5 DQ Mixed 38.4 30% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 357GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 142 149 149 148 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 149 Write 150 Mixed 31 SusWrite 145 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB 1,414 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 370GB free Firmware: V5COA73A SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 64 65 65 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 66.9 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 64.9 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 29.9 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 26.5 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	653x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $327

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16