Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 13:29
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 122
59% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 383
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 32.4
21% 27.9 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 26.7
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 72 68 64 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 382
Write 123
Mixed 136
SusWrite 71.3
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 24.3
105% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 135
117% 178 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 103%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
445GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 96 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 85.8
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 94.3
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
270GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 76 78 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 68.5
Write 79.8
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 76.1
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 43%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
77GB free
Firmware: CP100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 46
Write 60.5
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 54.3
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback