Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 426 52% 397 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1238) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.75% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 7.06 6% 8.25 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 15.2 8% 9.58 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.75% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 316 Write 129 Mixed 156 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 19.6 99% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 108 112% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 1x8GB 3,004 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 10.5 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	206x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	108x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	46x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	23x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	19x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples	16x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	63x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 3,004 samples	45x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 43%, 7,364 samples	29x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $131

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16