HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	9 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '19 at 10:47
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 159 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 370 42% 332 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.32% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 9.81 Parallax 12.2 8% 10.8 fps	MRender 14.1 Gravity 12.4 Splatting 13.6 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.32% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 124 124 124 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.3% Average	Read 128 Write 124 Mixed 125 SusWrite 124 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 22.6 74% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 99.9 DQ Mixed 101 76% 101 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 95%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 166GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 130 130 130 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 146 Write 140 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 130 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 48GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.6 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 12.2 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	198x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	159x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	99x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	11x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16