Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote DT85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote DT85
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '19 at 00:13
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	83%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 44 1-Core 21.2 2-Core 32.3 23% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 37.2 8-Core 31.5 5% 34.3 Pts	64-Core 24.7 2% 24.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0252) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.87 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 4.26 3% 3.99 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: FG001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 19 35 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 46.8 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 35 25% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16