Asus CM6870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 23:48
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 505
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 64.8
59% 70.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 58.5
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1003B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 46 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 399
Write 278
Mixed 259
SusWrite 49.4
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 33.3
118% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 42.8
41% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 89%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
118GB free
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 75 71 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 356
Write 317
Mixed 143
SusWrite 72.7
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 14.8
52% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 11.7
11% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 56%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
932GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 207 186 178 174 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 218
Write 192
Mixed 155
SusWrite 190
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 12.8
46% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 15
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 58%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
133GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 41
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 50.2
31% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST1000LM010-9YH146 1TB
334GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 75 71 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
37% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 61.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 72.4
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNHC 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback