| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A1 |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130320 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 26 '19 at 17:39 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | BIH-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
74% 124 Pts
|
57% 445 Pts
|
30% 494 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
22.9%
Poor
|
23% 30.1 fps
|
23% 27.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 216 210 260 228 218 MB/s
|
70.1%
Very good
|
52% 230 MB/s
|
106% 36.6 MB/s
|
169% 259 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
466GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 118 119 119 MB/s
|
68%
Good
|
79% 107 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
58.8%
Above average
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
62% 65.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 71x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 15x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |