Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 941
87% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,328
89% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$500
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 301
Reflection 230
Parallax 469
79% 333 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 316
Splatting 289
84% 262 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 95%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 308 304 301 299 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2011
Write 1,498
Mixed 684
SusWrite 358
251% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.9
199% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 623
528% 775 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 201%
Great: 235%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
107GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 276 262 290 281 282 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 503
Write 212
Mixed 285
SusWrite 277
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 25.2
101% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 124
106% 163 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
183GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 146 144 158 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 325
Write 208
Mixed 235
SusWrite 145
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 40
147% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 170
133% 181 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 84%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$66
241GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 95.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 35.6
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESTK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 33
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 31.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 7,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $532
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback