Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 187 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 329 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.1.2 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 13.6 8% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 9.57 Splatting 16.2 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 442 Write 348 Mixed 300 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 42.7 154% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 154 168% 282 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 104%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 18GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 49 49 49 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 64.3 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 48.5 41% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 27,462 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	105x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16