Alienware Aurora R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R6  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07HV66
Memory33.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display800 x 480 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$327
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 598
62% 488 Pts
64-Core 610
41% 610 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$334
Nvidia(10DE 12FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 322
Reflection 268
Parallax 339
85% 310 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 227
Splatting 144
68% 206 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 92%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 431GB
164GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 385 410 419 402 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 428
Mixed 362
SusWrite 389
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 38
137% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 226
184% 258 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 112%
Inateck ASM1153E 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 65 66 66 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.53% Terrible
Read 69
Write 67
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 64.8
14% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 83 105 110 110 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 123
Write 112
Mixed 65
SusWrite 104
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$75
99GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 51 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 71
Write 69.7
Mixed 48
SusWrite 50.8
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 64%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
742GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 114 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 151
Write 116
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 112
147% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 67%
Innostor Innostor 64GB
36GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 115
Write 61.7
Mixed 64
SusWrite 50.1
90% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
31% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aurora R6 Builds (Compare 1,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Alienware Aurora R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $677
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $325Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback