Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '19 at 11:05
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 732 77% 618 Pts	64-Core 738 46% 738 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 86A8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.8% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 88.7 Parallax 90.7 79% 92.1 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 85.7 Splatting 74.5 70% 87 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB 26,501 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 527 302 302 301 301 298 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 576 Write 947 Mixed 832 SusWrite 338 153% 673 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 33.2 147% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 710 DQ Write 973 DQ Mixed 718 577% 801 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 223%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 281GB free Firmware: SBFA15.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 355 315 254 198 203 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 321 Write 103 Mixed 88 SusWrite 275 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 20.1 60% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 231 199% 292 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 3,476 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 10.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	191x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	180x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	61x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16