Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181225
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 128
50% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 213
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 214
14% 214 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 34
29% 32.4 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 33.3
29% 35 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
76GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 0 0 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 48.7
Write 50.2
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 11.8
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 90 91 93 87 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 74.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 88
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 25,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback