PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170322 |
Uptime | 5 Days |
Run Date | Aug 24 '19 at 21:52 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$210
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 163 147 143 164 138 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 155 152 161 149 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 131 132 132 130 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 182 186 185 186 186 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.4%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 469x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 78x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $210Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 89x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 84x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 74x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $900 |