Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 98
2-Core 208
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 424
54% 412 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.6
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$120
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 210 177 177 169 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 817
Write 589
Mixed 646
SusWrite 229
127% 570 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 29.7
112% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 201
164% 242 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 143%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
222GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 148 100 107 108 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 443
Write 336
Mixed 277
SusWrite 152
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 9.8
42% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
223GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 103 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 100
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 104
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $423
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback