Asus X99-M WS/SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS/SE  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 09:40
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$78
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 245
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 835
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B4) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 16.2
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 21.1
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 560 465 400 401 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 705
Write 556
Mixed 595
SusWrite 462
130% 580 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.9
241% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 905
617% 757 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 161%
Great: 280%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
4GB free, PID 09c2, Sony 8GB
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 137
Write 30.7
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 30.5
56% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
65% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 103
Write 12.2
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 16.1
37% 38 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
40% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 32.2
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 23.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback