MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 02:28
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 752
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 115
Parallax 115
89% 113 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 94.4
79% 97.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 367 298 301 305 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 470
Mixed 368
SusWrite 334
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 55.1
181% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 292
223% 301 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
467GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1782 1600 1598 1595 1574 1574 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
404% Outstanding
Read 2,577
Write 2,457
Mixed 1,888
SusWrite 1,620
479% 2,136 MB/s
4K Read 75.8
4K Write 305
4K Mixed 113
421% 164 MB/s
DQ Read 1895
DQ Write 1,379
DQ Mixed 1534
1,174% 1,603 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 404%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
468GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 444 450 453 453 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 471
Mixed 450
SusWrite 448
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 54.3
178% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 289
222% 302 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
264GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 101 89 63 61 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 151
Write 132
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 86.3
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
405GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 92 92 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 111
Write 192
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 94.6
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41.9
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 22.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 7 (MS-7885) - $289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $1,028
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback