Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7267U 583 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 111 2-Core 186 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 299 41% 304 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 1,818 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Apple(106B 0175) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 12.9 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 10.7 10% 11.3 fps	MRender 14.4 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 19.5 13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 16.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 1371 1359 1349 1333 1381 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB 2,090 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 26 MC Write 49.4 MC Mixed 24.3 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 30.5 SC Mixed 21.3 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-7267UIntelBench 59%, 583 samples	9x
Core i7-7567UIntelBench 64%, 1,965 samples	2x

GPU
Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 9%, 1,818 samples	9x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
50 1TBCt1000mxBench 88%, 2,171 samples	1x
Extreme SSD 500GBSandiskBench 67%, 4,692 samples	1x
Portable SSD T5 500GBSamsungBench 75%, 14,526 samples	1x

RAM
0x4D5435324C3531324D3332443250462D3039 2x4GBUnknownBench 82%, 1,234 samples	5x
0x483943434E4E4E434C47414C41522D4E5644 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 170 samples	3x
0x4B3445364533303445422D45474347202020 2x4GBUnknownBench 83%, 303 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16