Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120912
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '16 at 21:36
Run Duration774 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$350
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 177
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 434
49% 377 Pts
64-Core 470
32% 470 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2871) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7557
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 96.4
20% 77.7 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 55.4
24% 69.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 364
Write 250
Mixed 261
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 8.43
53% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 32.1
52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST1000DM005 HD10 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 132
Write 156
Mixed 139
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.52
141% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 32
Write 28
Mixed 10
27% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 32GB
25GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 3.06
Mixed 5.68
8% 8.36 MB/s
4K Read 3.76
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 1.11
101% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 13%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 5.44
Mixed 7.34
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.83
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
19% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 4.07
Mixed 6.61
10% 9.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.52
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
18% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAB 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-1600C9-4GAB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 2,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $526
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $368Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback