Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 04:26
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 16.4
2-Core 31.4
26% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 63.5
8-Core 107
10% 85.2 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 19.1
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 183 239 251 251 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 323
Write 327
Mixed 322
SusWrite 236
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 27
86% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 177
129% 169 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
811GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 109 113 111 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 108
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
692GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 77.5
Write 78.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 77.1
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 32GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback