Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75 Pro3-M (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120912
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '19 at 03:26
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 83.5 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 171 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 326 32% 262 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.6% Average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 59.1 50% 62.2 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 0.13 30% 42.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 60 18 110 50 130 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 232 Write 208 Mixed 194 SusWrite 81.9 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 12.7 50% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 93.4 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 30.1 37% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 100 103 101 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 102 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 3x2GB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	136x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	37x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	19x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 51%, 607 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $410

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16