Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '19 at 01:24
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 135 2-Core 270 86% 160 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 777 82% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,011 63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 59.4 56% 65.3 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 65.7 55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 656 901 899 896 899 899 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2,050 Write 912 Mixed 696 SusWrite 858 249% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 49.8 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 57.3 226% 84.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,094 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 380 366% 600 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 243%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 917GB free Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 1044 1116 1156 1163 1163 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1362 Write 1,164 Mixed 958 SusWrite 1031 253% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 59.1 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 78.7 271% 96.8 MB/s	DQ Read 680 DQ Write 690 DQ Mixed 269 317% 546 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 295%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 238GB free Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 912 917 915 915 915 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,064 Write 922 Mixed 783 SusWrite 915 259% 1,171 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 57.9 222% 81.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,093 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 388 370% 602 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 243%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SUV400S 480GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 447GB free Firmware: 0C3F SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 357 276 154 120 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 343 Write 367 Mixed 258 SusWrite 204 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 14.3 47% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 83.6 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 91.9 82% 119 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 57%
Amd-raid SanDisk S48 480GB 441GB free Firmware: R211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 225 222 227 219 227 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	Read 324 Write 196 Mixed 236 SusWrite 224 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 6.9 23% 6.93 MB/s

Jmicron Generic 512GB 619 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 477GB free Firmware: 2102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 337 339 339 310 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 306 Write 336 Mixed 299 SusWrite 302 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 60.6 4K Mixed 37.2 122% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 203 152% 202 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 87%
Amd-raid WDC WD15EADS-00P 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 92 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 99.8 59% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.5% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 28.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 28.4 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 2,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	566x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	524x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	455x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	325x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	267x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	193x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	261x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	185x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	144x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	62x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16