PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8710w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30C3 |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111207 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 22 '19 at 19:11 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
34.6%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M
HP(103C 30C3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
|
1.89%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 184 143 148 146 146 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
12GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 3.1 3.8 3.4 3.2 MB/s
|
3.04%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate USB 120GB
53GB free, PID a003
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 22 23 23 23 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples | 4x |
Core2 Duo T8300Intel $27Bench 37%, 2,604 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 18% - Very poor | Total price: $309 |