Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 155
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 338
36% 279 Pts
64-Core 390
26% 390 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6861
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 20.3
4% 22.3 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 27.5
6% 22.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 222 242 259 223 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 567
Mixed 866
SusWrite 252
149% 670 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 43
136% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 567
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 450
352% 488 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 120%
Great: 210%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 49 46 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 24.8
Write 48.8
Mixed 51
SusWrite 46.7
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 30 14 14 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 77.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 28.9
47% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback