Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 262 27% 218 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.57% Terrible	Lighting 7.83 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 7.84 6% 9.02 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 7.07 Splatting 15.7 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+931GBHDD 1TB 654 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 822GB free (System drive) Firmware: 16.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 91 101 89 110 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 823 Write 148 Mixed 244 SusWrite 111 72% 332 MB/s	4K Read 130 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 93.1 356% 99.1 MB/s	DQ Read 703 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 257 233% 371 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 2,591 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	62.7% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 18.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 24.2 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	1,098x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	39x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	13x

SSD
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	68x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	40x
HFS128G32TNF-N3A0A 128GBBench 66%, 1,919 samples	40x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	110x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	84x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 56%, 2,591 samples	62x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16