Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) 4,762 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 84.4 35% 56.9 Pts	4-Core 85.4 8-Core 85.6 11% 85.5 Pts	64-Core 81.5 5% 81.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39F9) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 6.88 Parallax 4.44 0% 3.8 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 4.35 3% 3.78 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-DE128 128GB 372 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: TD76201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 99 99 95 99 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 362 Write 144 Mixed 99.7 SusWrite 101 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 34.8 100% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 120 104% 155 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 1.8 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	99x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	62x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
CV3-DE256 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 1,719 samples	5x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples	5x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16