Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '19 at 02:20
Run Duration	498 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 80.7 1-Core 153 2-Core 288 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 991 97% 794 Pts	64-Core 1,459 90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Lighting 69.5 Reflection 71 Parallax 87.8 57% 76.1 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 70.2 Splatting 56.4 53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 361GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 315 304 304 299 290 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 319 Mixed 314 SusWrite 305 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 36.2 148% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 176 140% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 129%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 1,926 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 527GB free Firmware: 0406 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 101 109 99 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 84.5 Write 108 Mixed 85 SusWrite 103 22% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.5 8% 4.13 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 4.4 DQ Mixed 2 2% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 18%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 184 185 186 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 123 Write 110 Mixed 30 SusWrite 182 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.8 222% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 43GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 86 85 74 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 108 Write 96.5 Mixed 75 SusWrite 76.6 66% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS5C3015ALA632 1.5TB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 109GB free Firmware: ML5OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 78.8 Write 81.5 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 79.5 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 66%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 119 120 119 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 108 Write 72.2 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 119 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 96%
WD My Book 1230 5TB 1,107 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 13GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 91.8 Write 96 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 71.8 110% 82 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 63%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 13GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 37.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 40.4 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 4,740 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 36.4 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 36.4 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 171%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 195%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	45x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	41x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	35x

GPU
RX 6900-XTAMD $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples	18x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	17x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	17x

SSD
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	13x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	11x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 103%, 778 samples	9x
4000 C19 Series 4x8GBUnknownBench 109%, 1,748 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $1,495

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16