Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2710QE 52 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 52.9 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 71.5 34% 52.9 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 279 25% 212 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 899GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 307 310 312 319 313 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 132 Write 152 Mixed 235 SusWrite 308 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 20.5 68% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 34.4 30% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.C2GCN.AT30C 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 16.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	15x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

RAM
KingTiger 1x4GBUnknownBench 27%, 18 samples	4x
TS512MSK64V3N 1x4GBTranscendBench 26%, 60 samples	2x
AQD-SD3L4GN16-S G 1x4GBTranscendBench 25%, 50 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16