| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P5QL-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080820 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 21 '19 at 19:00 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
43.1%
Average
|
38% 58.7 Pts
|
19% 143 Pts
|
9% 145 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Poor
|
30% 33.8 fps
|
29% 36.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
92GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 33 45 41 52 59 MB/s
|
22.8%
Poor
|
19% 26.1 MB/s
|
108% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 38 36 49 58 MB/s
|
27.2%
Poor
|
39% 52.9 MB/s
|
74% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
18% 6.47 GB/s
|
16% 5.53 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 19x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 11x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $308 |