Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	6.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 168 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 350 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3554) 2GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 20.3 15% 17.8 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 16.6 16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 22 27 11 27 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 11.5 Write 44.3 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 26.8 17% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$37 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: MK7OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 138 140 138 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 142 Write 139 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 138 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$37 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 125 124 129 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 126 Write 126 Mixed 66 SusWrite 126 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 0443 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 10GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	379x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	335x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16