Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 12:52
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 48.7
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 138
44% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 207
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 71
Parallax 63.6
57% 68.3 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 66
Splatting 57.8
50% 61 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 301 290 270 249 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 479
Write 432
Mixed 412
SusWrite 278
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 45.9
150% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 92.2
76% 102 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 128%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90
87GB free
Firmware: 2AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 76 76 76 76 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 15.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 70.1
36% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
201GB free
Firmware: MCCI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 35
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 37.3
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G BLS2G3D1339DS1S00. BLS2G3D1339DS1S00. 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback