Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 07:15
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 136
61% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 433
41% 338 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 115
Parallax 97.8
85% 106 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 100
Splatting 105
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 129 6.3 7.1 6.5 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 455
Write 370
Mixed 374
SusWrite 81.4
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 24.4
121% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 34.1
77% 157 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 92%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
461GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 382 403 405 379 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 397
Mixed 376
SusWrite 383
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 48.3
163% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 227
176% 240 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
557GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 29 23 18 22 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 156
Write 8.5
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 23.8
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 129 124 130 129 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 73
SusWrite 130
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
33GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 61 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 60.9
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 62.7
38% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.3
179% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
9GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 140 141 126 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 135
Write 110
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 139
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback