Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190312
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '19 at 02:07
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 55.5 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 122 48% 82.5 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 395 39% 319 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 5,763 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 6153) 3GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 38.1 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 42.3 31% 37.5 fps	MRender 0.05 Gravity 34.8 Splatting 30.8 19% 21.9 fps
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 30%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 12,504 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 680 640 285 48 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 1,299 Write 671 Mixed 676 SusWrite 403 169% 762 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 41.5 142% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.8 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 59 58% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 244%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 394GB free Firmware: AX1R4F SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 87 88 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 75.8 Write 82.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 87.3 50% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 10.1 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 6.4 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	544x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	225x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	116x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	57x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	96x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16