Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190615
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '19 at 23:53
Run Duration	316 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 73.9 1-Core 145 2-Core 283 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 523 8-Core 903 86% 713 Pts	64-Core 1,346 83% 1,346 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 96%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E127) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.66 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8692) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 168 Parallax 163 140% 168 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 148 Splatting 112 117% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 304 304 306 306 306 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,033 Write 1,400 Mixed 543 SusWrite 480 246% 1,114 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 53.2 205% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,055 DQ Write 1,080 DQ Mixed 674 615% 936 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 501GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 456 456 451 451 449 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 450 Mixed 448 SusWrite 454 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 54.7 180% 63 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 206 155% 208 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 83GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 452 444 413 384 350 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 451 Mixed 333 SusWrite 416 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 41.3 150% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 119 112% 176 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 116%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 199GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 235 95 95 93 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 442 Mixed 369 SusWrite 178 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 55.6 184% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 204 151% 200 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 123%
Kingston HyperX 120GB 3,401 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 38GB free Firmware: 332ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 118 121 122 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 451 Write 151 Mixed 201 SusWrite 120 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 38.3 143% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 157 121% 165 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 81%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 407GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 92.7 Write 90.3 Mixed 63.3 61% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 198 197 200 199 199 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 158 Mixed 86 SusWrite 197 116% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 113%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 118GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 84 84 83 85 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 106 Write 94.7 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 81.8 68% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 76%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB 7,781 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 6.7 6 6.7 6 6.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 2.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 6.1 7% 6.05 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBD 2x16GB 1,600 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 28 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 26.7 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,636x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,260x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,233x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	864x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16