Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$95 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 227 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 621 59% 489 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 106 107 109 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 25.2 Write 14.2 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 108 30% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 25GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 14 11 13 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 86.8 Write 14 Mixed 41.6 SusWrite 13.1 42% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.4 93% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1,284x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	980x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	979x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	930x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	593x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	424x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $402

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16