Emachines eM350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemEmachines eM350  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer eM350
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime185.9 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 18:42
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
3.75% Terrible
1-Core 8.6
2-Core 11.7
5% 10.1 Pts
4-Core 13.3
8-Core 14.8
2% 14.1 Pts
64-Core 16.3
1% 16.3 Pts
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$29
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 26 20 25 23 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Read 8.9
Write 24
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 20.4
13% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 414352313238583634443253383030433620 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.42% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0
0% 0.03 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 9%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback