Monster TULPAR T7 V19.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.1
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 791
79% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 105F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 7.34
6% 37.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 14.7
9% 11 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 688 468 466 505 473 475 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 2,034
Write 1,379
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 512
274% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.4
163% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 445
335% 440 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 183%
Great: 311%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
214GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 208 196 198 193 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 480
Write 426
Mixed 331
SusWrite 236
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 33.3
112% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 241
203% 296 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 101 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 98.7
Write 101
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 102
120% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.4
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 23.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback