Asus P5B-PLUS Series

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5B-PLUS Series (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090310
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '19 at 16:18
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 28.3 2-Core 57 39% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 107 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 34DB) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	9.08% Terrible	Lighting 12.3 Reflection 9.27 Parallax 4.84 10% 8.8 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 10 Splatting 7.09 7% 9.11 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.08% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 43 43 42 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.7% Poor	Read 210 Write 185 Mixed 141 SusWrite 41.1 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 16.6 57% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 20.7 16% 22 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 56%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 123GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 66 65 69 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 68.6 Write 37.8 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 66.6 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 44%
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59 3,786 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 46GB free Firmware: V44OA96A SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 36.6 Mixed 32 SusWrite 42.4 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 36%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 359GB free, PID 022a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 20.7 Write 14 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 20.2 25% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 41%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.4 9.7 10 10 10 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	8.37% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 8.7 Mixed 12 SusWrite 9.7 15% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.5 93% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.37% Great: 16%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 775 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 27GB free, PID 005b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.6 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 7.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 2.6 12% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5B-PLUS Series Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B-PLUS Series

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	2x

SSD
CS1311 240GBPNY $78Bench 81%, 26,547 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	10x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,020

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16