| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 |
| Memory | 28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150116 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 20 '19 at 07:08 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel @ 2.80GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
|
66.9%
Good
|
61% 102 Pts
|
51% 428 Pts
|
54% 870 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
96% 163 fps
|
116% 146 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 440 430 426 424 430 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
94% 416 MB/s
|
178% 62.5 MB/s
|
270% 361 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: A840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 108 107 107 99 98 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
60% 81.6 MB/s
|
119% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70AH0-YH9 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
47.3%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
49% 81.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9SRA/X9SRA-3 Builds (Compare 91 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 15x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 8x |
| Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 7x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 4x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $692 |