Lenovo 20NES02N00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20NES02N00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NES02N00
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 06:06
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 152
48% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 463
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 19
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 17.9
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDHTNG-8710B 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80010C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 469 529 519 482 572 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 907
Write 452
Mixed 446
SusWrite 510
129% 579 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 33.7
114% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 682
510% 682 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 133%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback