Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 02:41
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 124
52% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 348
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 66.8
54% 64.8 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 55.4
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 39 60 40 38 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 266
Write 58.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 52.8
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 0.1
64% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 97.6
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 20.6
54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
431GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 148 148 148 146 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 164
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 146
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
597GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 154 157 153 143 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 153
Write 151
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 151
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB
29GB free
Firmware: HP22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 71 72 72 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 111
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 72.5
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
77GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 148 143 130 134 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 151
Write 163
Mixed 29
SusWrite 136
86% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback