Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca) 12,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 55.3 1-Core 36.3 2-Core 65 34% 52.2 Pts	4-Core 99.5 8-Core 95.5 13% 97.5 Pts	64-Core 95.1 6% 95.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3802) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 3.59 2% 3.61 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000 128GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT63L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 60 43 29 25 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 415 Write 127 Mixed 156 SusWrite 42.7 40% 185 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 17.5 75% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 27.7 DQ Mixed 44.4 44% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.1 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	9x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	4x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	1x

SSD
MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 49%, 3,311 samples	5x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	6x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	3x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16