Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '19 at 17:06
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 83.1 1-Core 133 2-Core 237 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 627 65% 525 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 38 Parallax 30.9 27% 33.9 fps	MRender 46.9 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 42.9 34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 345GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 173 176 174 175 173 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 200 Mixed 286 SusWrite 176 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 44.1 162% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 216 182% 270 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$250 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 800GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 458 449 471 472 473 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 470 Mixed 449 SusWrite 460 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 54.3 187% 66.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.6% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 22.6 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 18.6 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 131%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,152x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	177x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	79x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	62x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	81x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	56x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	52x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,222

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16