ECS GF7100/7050PVT-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardECS GF7100/7050PVT-M3  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 23:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7200-$14
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 60.1
42% 59 Pts
4-Core 71
8-Core 67.8
9% 69.4 Pts
64-Core 69.5
4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1557) 1GB
CLim: 981 MHz, MLim: 1128 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 14
Parallax 10.1
10% 12 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 16.3
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 98 110 108 119 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 123
Write 109
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 106
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback