Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 674
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 192
Parallax 184
121% 175 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 184
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 57 51 64 51 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 446
Write 96.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 61.7
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 8.3
63% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 0.2
32% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 86%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
110GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 109 105 114 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 192
Mixed 158
SusWrite 112
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 29.5
124% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 139
115% 164 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
146GB free
Firmware: 505CUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 218 219 217 217 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 348
Write 269
Mixed 277
SusWrite 219
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 36.1
137% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 143
134% 208 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80%
Great: 85%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
59GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 111 64 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 449
Write 284
Mixed 266
SusWrite 108
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 20
82% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 42.5
48% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 55%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
132GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 96.8
Write 87.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 57.8
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 54%
WD My Passport 1TB
122GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 75.2
Write 78.2
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 78
96% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback