Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 16:35
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 132
58% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 222
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1410 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 84.4
60% 73.4 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 79.8
57% 68.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,420
Write 2,784
Mixed 2,574
650% 2,926 MB/s
4K Read 125
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 86.9
349% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 465
346% 458 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
96GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 192 231 248 191 274 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 155
Write 95.7
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 236
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 10.5
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.9
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 13
10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
378GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 107 88 105 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 106
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
518GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 152 151 151 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 170
Mixed 112
SusWrite 150
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
265GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 147 146 146 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 146
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-8GTX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 18.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback