PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B250M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180316 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '19 at 08:31 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
16%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 48 8.5 50 52 6.3 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
411GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 61 62 80 76 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 280x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 232x |
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 175x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 176x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 171x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 146x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $390 |